Re: [PATCH] remove sys_security

[Greg KH]

On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 10:20:21PM +0200, Russell Coker wrote:
>  With the current LSM setup of a 2^32 LSM calls, you can 
> choose a number somewhat arbitarily and be fairly sure that it won't conflict 
> and that you can later register the same number with the LSM people.

You do not have to "register" a syscall number with the LSM people.  We
don't care.  Use whatever you want for your sys_security call.  If you
want to be nice, read the documentation and use a module id that is
unique.

Personally I hate the "module id" idea, but that's just me...

thanks,

greg k-h