Re: [PATCH] remove sys_security

Chris Wright (chris@wirex.com)
Fri, 18 Oct 2002 15:36:50 -0700

* Stephen Smalley (sds@tislabs.com) wrote:
>
> On Fri, 18 Oct 2002, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> > It adds infrastructure to implement syscalls without peer review.
> > And then it ends being crap like the selinux syscalls.
>
> Yes, I think you've made your point. Go ahead, remove sys_security.

Looks like we should remove this. The interface is awkward, and there
are many examples of how it's not needed and is broken by design. I know
SubDomain can get by without it.

thanks,
-chris

-- 
Linux Security Modules     http://lsm.immunix.org     http://lsm.bkbits.net
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/