Re: [PATCH] Re: Pathological case identified from contest

Rik van Riel (riel@conectiva.com.br)
Sun, 20 Oct 2002 12:31:07 -0200 (BRST)


On Sun, 20 Oct 2002, Con Kolivas wrote:

> The rest of the results were otherwise similar. It seems your patch
> served to disadvantage kernel compilation in preference for more of the
> background load.

Probably a priority inheritance thing between parent and child
processes, this should be easily fixable to be fairer (if it
isn't already fairest with Jim's patch).

Rik

-- 
Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH".
http://www.surriel.com/		http://distro.conectiva.com/
Current spamtrap:  <a href=mailto:"october@surriel.com">october@surriel.com</a>

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/