Re: 2.4 mm trouble [possible lru race]

Richard Zidlicky (rdzidlic@immd8.informatik.uni-erlangen.de)
Sun, 20 Oct 2002 16:37:16 +0200 (MEST)


>
> On Tuesday 01 October 2002 20:04, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 01 2002, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 01 October 2002 19:31, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > > > Again, m68k was the target.
> > >
> > > Sure fine, no good reason to be cryptic about it though.
> > >
> > > #error "m68k doesn't do SMP yet"
> > >
> > > So SMP must be off or the compile would abort. Well, the only interesting
> >
> > There's no CONFIG_SMP in the m68k arch config.in. Anyways, enough
> > beating of dead horse :)
>
> The horse isn't dead yet, it's still twitching a little. At this
> point we still need to speculate about wny anyone would want an SMP
> Dragonball machine ;-)

not on Dragonball but there were many 68040 SMP systems around long
before Intel had anything SMP capable. In the late 80'ies those were
considered real number crunchers :)

Richard

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/