Re: [PATCH] work around duff ABIs

Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
21 Oct 2002 17:26:25 +0100

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Wakko Warner: "Re: [OT] Please don't call it 3.0!! (was Re: The reason to call it 3.0 is the desktop (was Re: [OT] 2.6 not 3.0 - (NUMA)))"
Previous message: jbradford@dial.pipex.com: "Re: Docs for 2.4.x -> 2.6.x"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] work around duff ABIs"

On Mon, 2002-10-21 at 14:48, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 01:13:39PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > On Sun, 2002-10-20 at 05:31, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > >
> > > *sigh*. i hate this kind of bullshit. please, don't anyone ever try
> > > to pass 64-bit args through the syscall interface again.
> >
> > Please bury this crap in arch/hppa/
>
> and arch/mips?

IMHO yes

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Wakko Warner: "Re: [OT] Please don't call it 3.0!! (was Re: The reason to call it 3.0 is the desktop (was Re: [OT] 2.6 not 3.0 - (NUMA)))"
Previous message: jbradford@dial.pipex.com: "Re: Docs for 2.4.x -> 2.6.x"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] work around duff ABIs"