Re: epoll (was Re: [PATCH] async poll for 2.5)
Benjamin LaHaise (bcrl@redhat.com)
Tue, 22 Oct 2002 14:37:08 -0400
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 11:18:20AM -0700, Davide Libenzi wrote:
> Alan, could you provide a code snipped to show how easy it is and how well
> it fits a 1:N ( one task/thread , N connections ) architecture ? And
> looking at Ben's presentation about benchmarks ( and for pipe's ), you'll
> discover that both poll() and AIO are "a little bit slower" than
> sys_epoll. Anyway I do not want anything superflous added to the kernel
> w/out reason, that's why, beside the Ben's presentation, there're curretly
> people benchmarking existing solutions.
That's why I was hoping async poll would get fixed to have the same
performance characteristics as /dev/epoll. But.... :-/
-ben
--
"Do you seek knowledge in time travel?"
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/