Re: Crunch time -- the musical. (2.5 merge candidate list 1.5)

Martin J. Bligh (mbligh@aracnet.com)
Thu, 24 Oct 2002 15:38:36 -0700


> The situation is really funny: Everybody seems to agree that the design
> ideas in my NUMA aproach are sane and exactly what we want to have on
> a NUMA platform in the end. But instead of concentrating on tuning the
> parameters for the many different NUMA platforms and reshaping this
> aproach to make it acceptable, IBM concentrates on a very much stripped
> down aproach.

your scheduler degraded the performance on my machine, rather than
boosting it. Half of that was the more complex stuff you added on
top ... it's a lot easier to start with something simple that works
and build on it, than fix something that's complex and doesn't work
well.

I still haven't been able to get your scheduler to boot for about
the last month without crashing the system. Andrew says he has it
booting somehow on 2.5.44-mm4, so I'll steal his kernel tommorow and
see how it looks. If the numbers look good for doing boring things
like kernel compile, SDET, etc, I'm happy.

M.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/