Re: [PATCH] pre-decoded wchan output

[Robert Love]

On Mon, 2002-10-21 at 19:08, Pavel Machek wrote:

> Yes, and force users to update procps for no good reason. And "new"
> procps will still need code to deal with get_wchan themselves... Plus
> you loose information by killing get_wchan() -- two different wait
> points in one function seems very possible to me.

- users of 2.5 need a new procps but only wchan is "broken" and
  only if CONFIG_KALLSYMS is set anyhow

- I did not kill get_wchan, just do not use it in stat - in fact
  I use it in the new wchan approach, too

- its not an issue now because the updated patch (posted 5 days
  after this email you are replying to) keeps wchan.

So you got your way.  Look at the patch posted 22 Oct.  It is now in
2.5-mm.

	Robert Love