Re: programming for preemption (was: [PATCH] 2.5.46: access permission

Zwane Mwaikambo (zwane@holomorphy.com)
Mon, 11 Nov 2002 18:58:46 -0500 (EST)


On Mon, 11 Nov 2002, Olaf Dietsche wrote:

> Thanks for this hint. So this means kmalloc(GFP_KERNEL) inside
> spinlock is not necessarily dangerous, but should be avoided if
> possible? Is using a semaphore better than using spinlocks? Is
> there a list of dos and don'ts for preempt kernels beside
> Documentation/preempt-locking.txt?
>
> And btw, who is "us"?

The Cab^Kernel developers ;)

-- 
function.linuxpower.ca

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/