Re: Some functions are not inlined by gcc 3.2, resulting code is ugly

Denis Vlasenko (vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua)
Wed, 13 Nov 2002 10:48:01 -0200

On 13 November 2002 09:54, Denis Vlasenko wrote:
> On 12 November 2002 23:28, J.A. Magall?n wrote:
> > On 2002.11.04 Denis Vlasenko wrote:
> > [...]
> >
> > > __constant_c_and_count_memset *has to* be inlined.
> > > There is large switch statement which meant to be optimized out.
> > > It does optimize out *only if* count is compile-time constant.
> >
> > I also got tons of __copy_to_user and __copy_from_user in 2.4.
> > Do not show in 2.5 ?
>
> I haven't looked.

I looked there, there is no _constant_XXX inlines in 2.5's uaccess.h

BTW, what a joy seeing sane asm formatting there!
No sight of '\t' ;)

BTW #2: in order to have sane asm formatting _and_ pretty asm
generated by GCC one would add "\n" after 'asm(':

__asm__ __volatile__("\n" <---------------
"1: mov a,b\n"
.....

--
vda
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/