I think it's at the stage where it needs a "nag" factor. Those little
reminder emails from bugzilla are really irritating.
> If so, when I
> discussed this with Martin one of the roles we agreed I would play was
> taking bug reports from the list and adding them to bugzilla. I'll also
> be a "filter" for some of the issues discussed in this thread, sort of a
> janitor if you will.
Sounds very useful.
> My question is how should compile failures figure into the bug database?
> Most of the compile failures are typos or thinkos that get quickly fixed.
> Should they get tracked, or dismissed quickly unless they linger on. I
> didn't track simple compile failures in my list.
I'd say don't include them. It's not as if we're likely to forget
about them.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/