Re: Modules with list

Adam J. Richter (adam@yggdrasil.com)
Fri, 29 Nov 2002 00:23:25 -0800


>In message <200211280025.QAA07845@baldur.yggdrasil.com> you write:
>> Rusty Russel wrote:

>That's Russell 8)

>> >Sorry, that's why I said "*If O_NONBLOCK* is specified" (ie. still
>> >drop it for the --wait case).
>>
>> Oops! Sorry for misreading your message.
>>
>> Even though it was not responsive to what you described, I do
>> hope you see my point about the problem with "rmmod --wait".

>But's it's an absolute requirement, to make modules removable in some
>circumstances, otherwise you end up being starved and the module
>cannot be removed (security modules and netfilter modules strike me as
>the obvious cases, but there are probably more).

That may be a drawback, but I would necessarily say that
avoiding those drawbacks is an "absolute requirement" based on the
disadvantages you listed, nor would attaching that label magically
eliminate the problem that I described.

Adam J. Richter __ ______________ 575 Oroville Road
adam@yggdrasil.com \ / Milpitas, California 95035
+1 408 309-6081 | g g d r a s i l United States of America
"Free Software For The Rest Of Us."
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/