Re: [RFC] LSM fix for stupid "empty" functions

Greg KH (greg@kroah.com)
Sun, 1 Dec 2002 11:25:32 -0800


On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 04:46:43AM +1100, James Morris wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Dec 2002, Greg KH wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Dec 01, 2002 at 05:59:10PM +0100, Olaf Dietsche wrote:
> > > > VERIFY_STRUCT(struct security_operations, ops, err);
> > >
> > > This shouldn't be necessary anymore.
> >
> > Good point, I'll remove it. It was a hack anyway :)
> >
>
> I think we still want to make sure that the module author has explicitly
> accounted for all of the hooks, in case new hooks are added.

But with this patch, if the module author hasn't specified a hook, they
get the "dummy" ones. So the structure should always be full of
pointers, making the VERIFY_STRUCT macro pointless.

thanks,

greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/