> Im using your fair scheduler patch (2.4.19-fairsched),
> Without the fairsched patch, ps output is normal, eg,
> init is always the first process listed,
> Im just wondering, is this
> purely aesthetically or is there something fishy?
The fairsched patch reorders processes on the tasklist so
that the processes of a user all get CPU time alternately.
It's just a cosmetic issue, caused by the fact that procfs
walks that same list to display all the tasks and now that
list can get reordered ...
regards,
Rik
-- Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH". http://www.surriel.com/ http://guru.conectiva.com/ Current spamtrap: <a href=mailto:"october@surriel.com">october@surriel.com</a>- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/