Re: [2.5.50, ACPI] link error
Jeff Garzik (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Thu, 05 Dec 2002 17:38:02 -0500
Pavel Machek wrote:
>>>Yes, there are about 10 patches to fix it floating around... I just
>>>hope linus takes one of them. (Fix is make ACPI_SLEEP depend on
>>I haven't seen the patch, but does it make sense for hardware suspend to
>>depend on software suspend?
>>IMO there should be a common core (CONFIG_SUSPEND?), not force ACPI to
>>depend on swsusp. That way you get the _least_ common denominator, not
>>the union of two sets.
> Feel free to fix that, but as swsusp is needed for S4, anyway, I do not
> see big need to do that.
Why should I fix your fix?
Doesn't that imply your fix is broken to begin with?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to email@example.com
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/