[BENCHMARK] short summary of LM bench performance of mm2 patch

Aniruddha M Marathe (aniruddha.marathe@wipro.com)
Fri, 13 Dec 2002 10:29:11 +0530


Hi,
Josh, please comment on the format.
Here is a short summary of performance of 2.5.51 mm2 as compared to 2.5.51 mm1 on LM bench. Figures below are 'median' of 5 results.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For detailed results, please mail me so that I will send results individually.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

2.5.51 mm1 2.5.51-mm2
==================================================================================
Processor, Processes - times in microseconds - smaller is better

1. Null call time decreased a bit. 0.46 0.44
2. increase in time for fork proc 362 403
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Context switching - times in microseconds - smaller is better

1. 2p/16K ctxsw 5.01 4.84
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*Local* Communication latencies in microseconds - smaller is better
1. UDP 33 35
2. TCP 122 125
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
File & VM system latencies in microseconds - smaller is better
1. 10K file delete 57 59
2. mmap latency 615 651
==================================================================================

Rest of the results are not much different.

Regards,
Aniruddha Marathe
WIPRO technologies, India
Aniruddha.marathe@wipro.com
+91-80-5502001 extn 5092
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/