Re: is KERNEL developement finished, yet ??? (ACLs)

Tracy R Reed (treed@ultraviolet.org)
Sat, 14 Dec 2002 21:29:14 -0800


--9amGYk9869ThD9tj
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 12:09:25PM -0800, Tupshin Harper spake thusly:
> I'm not at all opposed to capabilities, but I don't believe they come=20
> close to obviating ACLs. It also doesn't seem ACLs and capabilities are=
=20
> in any kind of conflict. Why could we not have both?

SE Linux seems to give you both.

--=20
Tracy Reed http://www.ultraviolet.org

--9amGYk9869ThD9tj
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iEYEARECAAYFAj38EyoACgkQ9PIYKZYVAq1z0QCgj4RKX3/UZ19Uvj0G9j9GA91I
RM0AnjbItf0FLJ5yjf9/UfW60gRnrDzo
=oQdb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--9amGYk9869ThD9tj--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/