2.5.52 a/arch/i386/mm/init.c

[Pavel Machek]

Hi!

In 2.5.52:

Looks suspect to me... Is it okay to do one_md_table_init, then just
discard the result? Why this change?
							Pavel

--- a/arch/i386/mm/init.c       Sun Dec 15 18:08:30 2002
+++ b/arch/i386/mm/init.c       Sun Dec 15 18:08:30 2002
@@ -134,8 +134,10 @@
        pgd = pgd_base + pgd_ofs;
        pfn = 0;

-       for (; pgd_ofs < PTRS_PER_PGD && pfn < max_low_pfn; pgd++,
pgd_ofs++) {
+       for (; pgd_ofs < PTRS_PER_PGD; pgd++, pgd_ofs++) {
                pmd = one_md_table_init(pgd);
+               if (pfn >= max_low_pfn)
+                       continue;
                for (pmd_ofs = 0; pmd_ofs < PTRS_PER_PMD && pfn <
max_low_pfn; pmd++, pmd_ofs++) {
                        /* Map with big pages if possible, otherwise
create normal page tables. */
                        if (cpu_has_pse) {

-- 
Worst form of spam? Adding advertisment signatures ala sourceforge.net.
What goes next? Inserting advertisment *into* email?