> > (Modulo the missing syscall page I already mentioned and potential bugs
> > in the code itself, of course ;)
> Ok, I did the vsyscall page too, and tried to make it do the right thing
> (but I didn't bother to test it on a non-SEP machine).
> I'm pushing the changes out right now, but basically it boils down to the
> fact that with these changes, user space can instead of doing an
> int $0x80
> instruction for a system call just do a
> call 0xfffff000
> instead. The vsyscall page will be set up to use sysenter if the CPU
> supports it, and if it doesn't, it will just do the old "int $0x80"
> instead (and it could use the AMD syscall instruction if it wants to).
> User mode shouldn't know or care, the calling convention is the same as it
> ever was.
Perhaps it makes sense to define that gettimeofday is done by
NOW? So we can add vsyscalls later?
-- Worst form of spam? Adding advertisment signatures ala sourceforge.net. What goes next? Inserting advertisment *into* email? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to firstname.lastname@example.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/