Re: inefficient RT vs efficient non-RT

Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Sun, 12 Jan 2003 03:04:44 -0500


--==_Exmh_-500163364P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

On Sun, 12 Jan 2003 02:58:44 EST, Mark Mielke said:
> Think about it logically -- if I can process 5X as much data as you can on
> the same hardware, but I can't guarantee that *at* 5X no data will be lost,
> but then, I only run at 1X (the same speed as you), how many packets have
> a chance of being lost?

The question is, of course, whether you're willing to bet the entire
chemical plant on the chances of a packet being lost.

There's a difference between "if the core temperature hits 350
degrees, the pump WILL go on in 13 milliseconds" and "if the core temp
hits 350 degrees, the pump will have a 98% chance of going on sometime
between 13 and 17.5 milliseconds..."

-- 
				Valdis Kletnieks
				Computer Systems Senior Engineer
				Virginia Tech

--==_Exmh_-500163364P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001

iD8DBQE+ISGbcC3lWbTT17ARAvkZAKDbrKuP+OQOSp2avW1spLLBorI+RQCeJL4x sm6WLPJxaRcqdt0+VBwlugo= =Y4R/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--==_Exmh_-500163364P-- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/