On Sun, 12 Jan 2003 14:58:39 PST, Alessandro Suardi said:
> > On Fri, 10 Jan 2003 20:00:31 +0100, Jochen Hein said:
> > > > - and I've seen a report it causes an OOPS
> > > > on 2.5.53. I've not tried it on post-52, but I had a -54 kernel OOPS
>
> Guess the report was mine :) note for readers, this is bug 134
> in the 2.5 kernel bug database at http://bugme.osdl.org .
>
> > > > right around that point in bootup (right after IDE and somewhere in PCI
> > > > init). Haven't chased that one at all...
> > if it OOPSes without my patch, then it's somebody else's problem.
>
> No, it did oops only with the patch.
My *original* patch (the one that just moved 2 lines) plus the 2-liner
by Zwane Mwaikambo to fix the DMA patch is working for me. I know Zwane's
patch is already in Bitkeeper, I don't think we've ever resolved the "right"
solution for mine....
-- Valdis Kletnieks Computer Systems Senior Engineer Virginia Tech
--==_Exmh_-1721357872P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iD8DBQE+IfdgcC3lWbTT17ARAtiwAJ9zr6PJkluFp5+ffEP/PZGqpnX4vwCg6hoW O3zhb/Av0h8+3Fm7ReeD82E= =MmJS -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_-1721357872P-- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/