RE: any chance of 2.6.0-test*?

[Folkert van Heusden]

> Am I wrong that the above would do the same thing without generating the
> sphagetti code that a goto would give you.  Gotos are BAD, very very
> bad.
TS> Whom do I pay to have this annoying clueless asshole shot?
TS> OH MY GOD, I really can't take any more.

Well well well, is that how we act these days if we see something we don't
like?

Anyway, I totally agree with Rob: if the code can be written without a goto
and produce the same efficient assembly (or better, see Robs change) it
should be written without it.
goto's are for lazy people