Re: gcc 2.95 vs 3.21 performance

John Bradford (john@grabjohn.com)
Tue, 4 Feb 2003 19:35:06 +0000 (GMT)

> I'm hesitant to enter into this. But from my own experience
> the issue with big companies supporting these sort of changes
> in gcc have more to do with the acceptance process of changes
> into gcc than a lack of desire on the large companies part.

Maybe we should create a KGCC fork, optimise it for kernel
complilations, then try to get our changes merged back in to GCC
mainline at a later date.

John.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/