Re: [BK PATCH] LSM changes for 2.5.59
Mark Hahn (hahn@physics.mcmaster.ca)
Wed, 5 Feb 2003 11:26:34 -0500 (EST)
> No. If one were to add such a field, then it would be accessible
> through the ctl_table structure that is already passed to the hook.
> You would not replace the ctl_table parameter with the kernel's
> sensitivity hint, since the security module must be able to make its
can all this LSM nonsese be CONFIG'ed out of the kernel as promised?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/