The code is correct as it originally stood.
It looks like indent has a bug and incorrectly formats this to look wrong.
Back in 2.2 times, the code looks like this:
for (new2size = 128; new2size < newsize; new2size <<= 1);
if (new2size - newsize > newsize - (new2size >> 1))
new2size >>= 1;
and this is the intended functionality. Please do NOT apply the patch.
-- Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk) The developer of ARM Linux http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/