> On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 01:08:55PM -0800, Kamble, Nitin A wrote:
> > + spin_lock(&desc->lock);
> > + irq_balance_mask[selected_irq] = target_cpu_mask;
> > + spin_unlock(&desc->lock);
>
> Wrong.
The desc locking for irq_balance_mask looks very strange, what made you
put it in?
Zwane
-- function.linuxpower.ca - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/