Re: [RFC] Is an alternative module interface needed/possible?

Roman Zippel (zippel@linux-m68k.org)
Tue, 18 Feb 2003 13:35:13 +0100 (CET)


Hi,

On Tue, 18 Feb 2003, Werner Almesberger wrote:

> I don't think we'll make much progress if we keep on mixing issues
> of interface correctness, current module constraints, and possible
> module interface changes, all that with performance considerations
> and minimum invasive migration plans thrown in. So I'd suggest the
> following sequence:

Um, another point, let's ignore "minimum invasive migration plans", if we
found a good solution, we can still figure out how to get there smoothly,
so this shouldn't be a primary concern.

bye, Roman

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/