Re: [PATCH] IPSec protocol application order

YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / =?ISO-2022-jp?B?GyRCNUhGIzFRTEAbKEI=?= (yoshfuji@wide.ad.jp)
Thu, 20 Feb 2003 07:07:48 +0900 (JST)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: shesha bhushan: "how to convert iovecs to page?"
Previous message: Ion Badulescu: "Re: [PATCH] add new DMA_ADDR_T_SIZE define"
In reply to: David S. Miller: "Re: [PATCH] IPSec protocol application order"

In article <20030219.133906.127189630.davem@redhat.com> (at Wed, 19 Feb 2003 13:39:06 -0800 (PST)), "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com> says:

> setkey is for manual keying and debugging. Therefore, disallowing
> experimenting with non-rfc-compliant orderings seems to lack purpose
> to me.

I'm for davem. Setkey is very flexible manual-keying tool and
we should not limit this flexibility.

--yoshfuji
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: shesha bhushan: "how to convert iovecs to page?"
Previous message: Ion Badulescu: "Re: [PATCH] add new DMA_ADDR_T_SIZE define"
In reply to: David S. Miller: "Re: [PATCH] IPSec protocol application order"