Re: [PATCH] add new DMA_ADDR_T_SIZE define

David S. Miller (davem@redhat.com)
Wed, 19 Feb 2003 14:38:41 -0800 (PST)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Tom Lendacky: "Re: [PATCH] IPSec protocol application order"
Previous message: Ion Badulescu: "Re: [PATCH] add new DMA_ADDR_T_SIZE define"

From: Ion Badulescu <ionut@badula.org>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 17:53:02 -0500 (EST)

So is the current wisdom something like "always treat dma_addr_t as a u64
and be happy"?

Yes.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Tom Lendacky: "Re: [PATCH] IPSec protocol application order"
Previous message: Ion Badulescu: "Re: [PATCH] add new DMA_ADDR_T_SIZE define"