Re: Longstanding networking / SMP issue? (duplextest)

David S. Miller (davem@redhat.com)
Thu, 20 Feb 2003 20:24:38 -0800 (PST)


From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 10:34:22 +0100

On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 01:20:43AM -0800, Simon Kirby wrote:
> Hmm...and this is considered desired behavior? It seems like an odd way
> of handling packets intended to test latency and reliability. :)

IP is best-effort. Dropping packets in odd cases to make locking simpler
is not unreasonable. Would you prefer an slower kernel?

True.

But this is a quality of implementation issue and I doubt the kernel
would be slower if we fixed this silly behavior.

Frankly, the locking is due to lazyness, rather than a specific design
decision. So let's fix it.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/