> > if possible i'd avoid putting more overhead into the scheduler - it's
> > clearly more performance-sensitive than the task create/exit path.
>
> This is a single non-serializing bit test, and if it means that the task
> counters are _right_, that's definitely the right thing to do.
ok. Plus the wait_task_inactive() stuff was always a bit volatile. Now we
could in fact remove it from release_task(), right?
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/