Re: oom killer and its superior braindamage in 2.4

Rik van Riel (riel@imladris.surriel.com)
Sun, 23 Feb 2003 17:53:58 -0300 (BRT)


On Sun, 23 Feb 2003, David Mansfield wrote:

> So you're saying that a process can stay in the D state, without ever
> getting enough resources to complete a single Uninteruptible wait, for
> hours at a time?

Or even in the R state, but that would only happen when there
is a kernel bug. The OOM killer can do nothing but hope for
the best and try another process if the first one doesn't want
to exit.

> Ok. Now I understand your patch. Thanks for the info.
>
> You should push your patch to Marcelo.

Will do.

cheers,

Rik

-- 
Engineers don't grow up, they grow sideways.
http://www.surriel.com/		http://kernelnewbies.org/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/