Re: Minutes from Feb 21 LSE Call

[David Lang]

I would call a 15% lead over the ia64 pretty substantial.

yes it's not the same clock speed, but if that's the clock speed they can
achieve on that process it's equivalent. the P4 covers a LOT of sins by
ratcheting up it's speed, what matters is the final capability, not the
capability/clock (if capability/clock was what mattered the AMD chips
would have put intel out of business and the P4 would be as common as
ia-64)

David Lang

 On Sun, 23 Feb 2003, David Mosberger wrote:

> Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2003 14:40:44 -0800
> From: David Mosberger <[e-mail]>
> Reply-To: [e-mail]
> To: Linus Torvalds <[e-mail]>
> Cc: [e-mail], [e-mail]
> Subject: Re: Minutes from Feb 21 LSE Call
>
> >>>>> On Sun, 23 Feb 2003 13:34:32 -0800 (PST), Linus Torvalds <[e-mail]> said:
>
>  Linus> Last I saw P4 was kicking ia-64 butt on specint and friends.
>
> I don't think so.  According to Intel [1], the highest clockfrequency
> for a 0.18um part is 2GHz (both for Xeon and P4, for Xeon MP it's
> 1.5GHz).  The highest reported SPECint for a 2GHz Xeon seems to be 701
> [2].  In comparison, a 1GHz McKinley gets a SPECint of 810 [3].
>
> 	--david
>
> [1] http://www.intel.com/support/processors/xeon/corespeeds.htm
> [2] http://www.specbench.org/cpu2000/results/res2002q1/cpu2000-20020128-01232.html
> [3] http://www.specbench.org/cpu2000/results/res2002q3/cpu2000-20020711-01469.html
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to [e-mail]
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>