|> Does gcc still warn about things like
|>
|> #define COUNT (sizeof(array)/sizeof(element))
|>
|> int i;
|> for (i = 0; i < COUNT; i++)
|> ...
|>
|> where COUNT is obviously unsigned (because sizeof is size_t and thus
|> unsigned)?
|>
|> Gcc used to complain about things like that, which is a FUCKING DISASTER.
How can you distinguish that from other occurrences of (int)<(size_t)?
Andreas.
-- Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de SuSE Linux AG, Deutschherrnstr. 15-19, D-90429 Nürnberg Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different." - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/