I fail to see any reason why as atomic_t is typdefed to a
volatile int which, on ix86 seems to be 32 bits.
Does anybody know if this is just some old comments from a
previous atomic_t type of, perhaps, char[3]?
Cheers,
Dick Johnson
Penguin : Linux version 2.4.18 on an i686 machine (797.90 BogoMips).
Why is the government concerned about the lunatic fringe? Think about it.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/