Re: ioctl32 consolidation -- call for testing

Ben Collins (bcollins@debian.org)
Thu, 27 Feb 2003 15:27:39 -0500


On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 02:51:35PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 11:26:06PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > This is next version of ioctl32 consolidation. At one point it
> > compiled on x86-64 and sparc64. I'm not 100% sure it still does...
> >
> > Could you try to apply it on your architecture, fix whatever breakage
> > it causes, and submit patch back to me?
> >
> > ia64 has very different ioctl32 emulation (and very short). What is
> > going on there? Also not all architectures knew about
> > register_ioctl32_translation. Ouch.
>
> Ok, so it was simple. Do you mind a patch that applies over yours?
>

Here it is. Sparc64's macros for ioctl32's assumed that cmd was u_int
instead of u_long. This look ok to you, Dave?

-- 
Debian     - http://www.debian.org/
Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/
Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/
Deqo       - http://www.deqo.com/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/