Re: Oops: 2.5.64 check_obj_poison for 'size-64'
Andrew Morton (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 23:58:45 -0800
Miles Bader <email@example.com> wrote:
> Andrew Morton <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> > All the arch/*/kernel/irq.c implementations are distressingly similar.
> > Andrey Panin did a bunch of work a while back to start consolidating the
> > common code but it didn't quite get finished off.
> Do you remember what was unfinished about it? I tried his patch, and it
> seemed to work fine; there were certainly still a few things left unmerged,
> but it was a _huge_ improvement over the current state.
Well I thought that many architectures were missing. But upon a re-read, I
see that he allowed architectures to be cut over to GENERIC_IRQ one at a
time. Seems fine.
Although at some point we really do need to stop cleaning stuff up, defer such
things into 2.7 and concentrate upon 2.5 bugs.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to email@example.com
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/