Re: is irq smp affinity good for anything?
Mark Hounschell (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Thu, 13 Mar 2003 12:58:16 -0500
> Thanks so much for your comments
> Yes... maybe there is also cache pingpong because common locks are in
> different cpus... I'will try it
> do you know what's the best/less intrusive patch that allows
> task cpu binding?
Probably the least intrusive can be gotten here:
Or the O(1) schedular patches. That is a little more intrusive though.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to email@example.com
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/