Re: 2.5.65-mm2
Andrew Morton (akpm@digeo.com)
Wed, 19 Mar 2003 16:33:37 -0800
"Steven P. Cole" <elenstev@mesatop.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > Summary: using ext3, the simple window shake and scrollbar wiggle tests
> > were much improved, but really using Evolution left much to be desired.
>
> Replying to myself for a followup,
>
> I repeated the tests with 2.5.65-mm2 elevator=deadline and the situation
> was similar to elevator=as. Running dbench on ext3, the response to
> desktop switches and window wiggles was improved over running dbench on
> reiserfs, but typing in Evolution was subject to long delays with dbench
> clients greater than 16.
OK, final question before I get off my butt and find a way to reproduce this:
Does reverting
http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/2.5/2.5.65/2.5.65-mm2/broken-out/sched-2.5.64-D3.patch
help?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/