--=_courier-27766-1048610101-0001-2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
* Bill Davidsen (davidsen@tmr.com) wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Mar 2003, Thomas Duffy wrote:
>=20
> > On Thu, 2003-03-20 at 09:51, Eli Carter wrote:
> > > So, who can beat his 15.10 bogomips?
> >=20
[...]
> > bogomips : 12.44
>=20
> At one point I ran Linux on a 386SX-16 with 12MB. That machine ran 1.2.13
> (IIRC) until Dec 31 1999, when I was afraid it was not Y2k hardened. I
> still see spam to glacial.tmr.com today. The name was NOT because it was
> so cool ;-)
>=20
> I may still have that board, but I'm not about to put it back in service
> to measure speed. Your firewall is the slowest "real machine" I've seen,
> emulation and embedded machines are not really general purpose.
If we're really curious...
sfrost@ns2:/home/sfrost> cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : unknown
cpu family : 4
model : 0
model name : 486
stepping : unknown
fdiv_bug : no
hlt_bug : no
f00f_bug : no
coma_bug : no
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : no
cpuid level : -1
wp : yes
flags :
bogomips : 9.42
This is my secondary name server. This was also after an upgrade from
a 386 because bind9 is a bloody pig. :) To be honest I've thought about
putting the 386 back in service as something else because unlike my web
server and primary name server there's no chance a CPU fan on it is
going to die causing a CPU to fry and the system to crash. At one point
the 386 had a 630 day uptime, running 2.2.16.
Stephen
--=_courier-27766-1048610101-0001-2
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+gIT6rzgMPqB3kigRArFMAJ0YsxfZ0osDubVBbizfZD5REm/BVwCePfjY
pR2drgFMsU7UJ0d8rMvHyEk=
=ohaA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=_courier-27766-1048610101-0001-2--