Re: [BK FBDEV] A few more updates.

[James Simmons]

> You "fixed" it by using GFP_ATOMIC but didn't test the result of
> kmalloc. That is very bad. GFP_ATOMIC can fail (return NULL), thus
> you will crash the kernel under high memory pressure.
> 
> I think the proper fix is, as you asked me, using a workqueue,
> that way, you can both use GFP_KERNEL allocations, and avoid
> the spinlock you added to fbmem.c, thus letting the fb_sync()
> ops on fbdev's be able to block.

Ug! The quick fix was a bad idea. I will work on the workqueue idea 
instead. Ignore the pull.