Re: PATCH: swsusp - 2.5.66 incremental
Nigel Cunningham (email@example.com)
Mon, 07 Apr 2003 09:48:35 +1200
On Mon, 2003-04-07 at 09:29, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > You really should have moved it to the driver model... having #ifdef
> > > in suspend.c for every driver would be very ugly.
> > Sorry. I thought that was the maintainer's job.
> Well, his job is to tell you to do it properly. Don't expect him to do
> the rewriting himself. [Also he probably is not using swsusp so he
> would not test that.]
Ah. Okay. So I learn something else about the way kernel develepment
works... the maintainer doesn't actually maintain the code! Guess I need
to learn the driver model stuff.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to firstname.lastname@example.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/