Re: [PATCH] aic7* claims all checked EISA io ranges (was:

Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
08 Apr 2003 21:18:39 +0100

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Benjamin Herrenschmidt: "Re: * 2.5.67 sleep function from illegal context"
Previous message: Steven Cole: "Re: 2.5.67 kernel BUG at fs/buffer.c:2538"
Next in thread: Justin T. Gibbs: "Re: [PATCH] aic7* claims all checked EISA io ranges (was: [MAILER-DAEMON@rumms.uni-mannheim.de: Returned mail: see transcript for details])"
Reply: Justin T. Gibbs: "Re: [PATCH] aic7* claims all checked EISA io ranges (was: [MAILER-DAEMON@rumms.uni-mannheim.de: Returned mail: see transcript for details])"
Reply: Robert Schiele: "Re: [PATCH] aic7* claims all checked EISA io ranges (was: [MAILER-DAEMON@rumms.uni-mannheim.de: Returned mail: see transcript for details])"

On Maw, 2003-04-08 at 21:51, Robert Schiele wrote:
> Thanks for your note. Hope you didn't feel offended. At least this was not
> my intention. I just wanted to notify all people related to the affected
> driver.
>
> So it's up to the kernel tree maintainers to bring this fix into their trees.

Maintainers submit changes to the Linux kernel tree, not vice versa. Its
push not pull

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/