Re: CONFIG_INPUT problems

[Roman Zippel]

Hi,

On Wed, 9 Apr 2003, Martin J. Bligh wrote:

> What to do ...
> 
> I thought about inverting the logic, and creating CONFIG_HEADLESS
> which is !CONFIG_INPUT basically ... but changing all the stuff
> depending on CONFIG_INPUT is rather invasive. So I was thinking of
> something like
> 
> CONFIG_HEADLESS
> 	bool "headless console support
> 	default "n"
> 
> if HEADLESS = y
> 	define_bool CONFIG_INPUT = n
> else
> 	define_bool CONFIG_INPUT = y
> endif

config INPUT
	default y if !HEADLESS

> or something vaguely along those lines ... except there doesn't
> seem to be a way I can see to force a config option on from the
> new config system? So that's actually a more general question, I guess ;-)

I know, this has been requested a few times, I hope to have something 
soon. (It's more a time problem.)

bye, Roman