Re: [benchmarks] various filesystems on 2.5.68

Hans Reiser (reiser@namesys.com)
Mon, 28 Apr 2003 16:53:59 +0400


rwhron@earthlink.net wrote:

>mount -t reiserfs -o defaults,noatime /dev/sdc1 /fs1
>
You should benchmark us with notail option if you want it to be fair
compared to less space conserving filesystems. This has a substantial
performance impact, and since you don't measure space usage in these
benchmarks....

> ---------------- Sequential ----------
> ----- Create ----- ---- Delete ----
> files /sec %CPU Eff /sec %CPU Eff
>2.5.68-ext3 65536 10828 70.3 15395 21160 98.0 2159
>2.5.68-reiserfs 131072 2935 37.3 7861 1787 25.7 6963
>
What is the meaning of the files parameter, and why is our number
different from the other filesystems?

-- 
Hans

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/