--=_courier-29791-1051538543-0001-2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
On Mon, 28 Apr 2003 03:35:10 -0700 (PDT)
Andre Hedrick <andre@linux-ide.org> wrote:
> There is one fundamental problem, and nobody has addressed.
>
> Who will enforce the GPL over DRM violations?
> Since it is a blanket over the entire kernel, and you have formally
> (for the most part) have authorized DRM, thus one assumes you are the only
> one who can pursue in a court of law.
Unless I am missing something, I was hoping for more of a sparse DRM implementation; not a blanket.
I was hoping to be able to `modprobe drm` for when I needed to use DRM and likewise `rmmod drm` for when I didn't want it. Maybe I am a little late in this disucssion, but that's just my hopes and whishes.
-Zack Gilburd
--=_courier-29791-1051538543-0001-2
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+rTQ6p5pFZoJAq2wRAm9CAJ9U4LMywpMrk8S9vYkgmhlhVe1N0wCaA80O
J8SR9ymgg+dBM4bXQ9yVr5I=
=E3Fx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=_courier-29791-1051538543-0001-2--