Oooh suprise.
>
> > There is one fundamental problem, and nobody has addressed.
> >
> > Who will enforce the GPL over DRM violations?
The copyright author if they so choose to do so.
> > Since it is a blanket over the entire kernel, and you have formally
> > (for the most part) have authorized DRM, thus one assumes you are the only
> > one who can pursue in a court of law.
>
> Unless I am missing something, I was hoping for more of a sparse DRM \
> implementation; not a blanket.
> I was hoping to be able to `modprobe drm` for when I needed to use DRM and likewise \
> `rmmod drm` for when I didn't want it. Maybe I am a little late in this \
> disucssion, but that's just my hopes and whishes.
-- ______________________________________________ http://www.linuxmail.org/ Now with e-mail forwarding for only US$5.95/yrPowered by Outblaze - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/