Re: Remains of seq_file conversion for DECnet, plus fixes

David S. Miller (davem@redhat.com)
Thu, 01 May 2003 14:22:35 -0700 (PDT)


From: Steven Whitehouse <steve@gw.chygwyn.com>
Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 22:35:46 +0100 (BST)

> The name is a bit generic for an export function. What about
> seq_release_kfree?

Yes, I'd considered that and eventually settled for the non-prefixed version
since it followed the pattern set by single_release() which doesn't have
the seq_ prefix. I don't mind changing it though if the prefixed version is
preferred,

I think a naming convention without a prefix is asking for
trouble. I'd ask that you add the prefix, the current convention
is troublesome and someone ought to clean that up.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/