--=_courier-9863-1051887756-0001-2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Fri, May 02, 2003 at 10:06:03AM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> > "Chris Sontag: We are using objective third parties to do comparisons o=
f=20
> > our UNIX System V [SCO-owned Unix] source code and Red Hat as an exampl=
e.=20
> > We are coming across many instances where our proprietary software has=
=20
> > simply been copied and pasted or changed in order to hide the origin of=
our=20
> > System V code in Red Hat. This is the kind of thing that we will need t=
o=20
> > address with many Linux distribution companies at some point."
>=20
> This almost sounds like they are pointing to userspace code rather than
> kernel code. I know Redhat and other dists put patches on their kernels,
> but I seriously doubt it's anything like retrofiting UnixWare code. It's
> more like supporting newer hardware, performance tweaking, and such.
>=20
> --=20
> Debian - http://www.debian.org/
> Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/
> Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/
> Deqo - http://www.deqo.com/
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
They are pointing to nothing. They do not know themselves what they are=20
talking about. SCO is dead now, they have nothing else to do except for=20
framing other projects. If this thing was true they could have just=20
pointed out where exactly the stolen code was.
--=20
--=_courier-9863-1051887756-0001-2
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+sof085BSfXDRJ5kRAvsRAJ0f58MaXdqf8Anq4nkKsKUgsdDHuQCeLbdc
S4cN3Zwujtj1PF9PnU+52Gk=
=prWN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=_courier-9863-1051887756-0001-2--