> In message <Pine.SOL.email@example.com> you w
> > Hi,
> > I've redone this patch. I've tested it and works okay for me.
> > It is as minimal as possible and I hope it can go in 2.5 soon.
> Only one request, that you push this slightly more, and make
> setup_arch() call parse_early_args(). Does that break something?
Shouldn't break anything, but it requires updating setup.c for each arch.
> That way the arch-specific parsing in setup_arch() can be converted to
> __setup (but doesn't need to be: archs can take their time).
> ie. we already have two-stage parsing, it'd be nice not to make it
> Minor nitpick:
> > @@ -241,7 +279,7 @@ static int __init unknown_bootoption(cha
> > val[-1] = '=';
> > /* Handle obsolete-style parameters */
> > - if (obsolete_checksetup(param))
> > + if (obsolete_test_checksetup(param))
> > return 0;
> Change comment to /* Ignore early params: already done in
> parse_early_args */ or something, and maybe rename
> obsolete_test_checksetup() to is_early_setup().
> Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to firstname.lastname@example.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/